In deze interactieve les ga je je Engelse kijk- en luistervaardigheid oefenen door te kijken en luisteren naar Dan Gilberts TED Talk over The surprising science of happiness.
ERK niveau: B2/C1
tijd: ± 30 minuten
Vragen
- vraag 1-5: vocabulaire (check of je de Nederlandse betekenis kent van een aantal belangrijke woorden in de Ted Talk)
- vraag 6-14: kijk- en luistervaardigheid (begripsvragen)
Quiz samenvatting
0 of 15 Vragen completed
Vragen:
Informatie
Je hebt de quiz al eerder voltooid. Daarom kun je hem niet meer opnieuw starten.
Quiz is aan het laden…
Je moet inloggen of inschrijven om de quiz te starten.
U moet eerst het volgende invullen:
Resultaten
Resultaten
0 of 15 Vragen answered correctly
Uw tijd:
De tijd is verstreken
You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0)
Behaalde punt(en): 0 of 0, (0)
0 verslag(en) in afwachting (mogelijke punt(en): 0)
| Gemiddelde score |
|
| Uw score |
|
Categorieën
- Niet gecategoriseerd 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Huidig
- Review
- Beantwoord
- Goed
- Fout
-
Vraag 1 of 15
1. Vraag
4 punt(en)The first questions are vocabulary questions testing your knowledge of and/or preparing you for the words used in this TED-talk.
Pre-watching
Match the verbs to their Dutch translations:Sorteer elementen
- over nadenken
- samenstellen
- aftreden
- overtreden, schenden
-
Here’s two different futures that I invite you to contemplate
-
We synthesize happiness, but we think happiness is a thing to be found.
-
he resigned in disgrace
-
which drives us to violate the rules either of prudence or of justice
Goed / 4 PuntenFout / 4 Punten -
Vraag 2 of 15
2. Vraag
3 punt(en)Pre-watching
Match the adjectives to their Dutch translations:Sorteer elementen
- bevorderend zijn voor
- lijdend aan geheugenverlies
- omkeerbaar
-
Because the reversible condition is not conducive to the synthesis of happiness.
-
What do they do? Well, let’s first check and make sure they’re really amnesiac.
-
It’s a very small increase, and it doesn’t much matter whether they were in the reversible or irreversible condition.
Goed / 3 PuntenFout / 3 Punten -
Vraag 3 of 15
3. Vraag
3 punt(en)Pre-watching
Match the nouns to their Dutch translations:Sorteer elementen
- nabootser
- aanpassing
- vooringenomenheid
-
Let’s see how your experience simulators are working.
-
Human beings have this marvellous adaptation that they can actually have experiences in their heads before they try them out in real life.
-
Something we call the impact bias, which is the tendency for the simulator to work badly.
Goed / 3 PuntenFout / 3 Punten -
Vraag 4 of 15
4. Vraag
3 punt(en)Pre-watching
Match the nouns to their Dutch translations:Sorteer elementen
- enthousiasme
- omzichtigheid
- berouw
-
but none of them can deserve to be pursued with that passionate ardor which drives us to violate the rules
-
which drives us to violate the rules either of prudence or of justice, or to corrupt the future tranquility of our minds,
-
either by shame from the remembrance of our own folly, or by remorse for the horror of our own injustice.”
Goed / 3 PuntenFout / 3 Punten -
Vraag 5 of 15
5. Vraag
4 punt(en)Pre-watching
Match the nouns to their meanings / Dutch translations:Sorteer elementen
- voorouder
- iemand met dwarslaesie
- model, voorbeeld
- product, grondstof
-
This is a trick that none of our ancestors could do
-
And a year after winning the lotto, lottery winners and paraplegics are equally happy with their lives.
-
This is a 50-year-old paradigm called the free choice paradigm.
-
because we have within us the capacity to manufacture the very commodity we are constantly chasing
Goed / 4 PuntenFout / 4 Punten -
Vraag 6 of 15
6. Vraag
3 punt(en)First, read the question, then watch the video.
(beginning – 2:09)Which of the following statements about the brain are correct according to Daniel Gilbert?
Goed / 3 PuntenFout / 3 Punten -
Vraag 7 of 15
7. Vraag
5 punt(en)First, read the question, then watch the video.
(2:09 – 3:54)
The impact bias is the tendency for peopleGoedFout -
Vraag 8 of 15
8. Vraag
5 punt(en)First, read the question, then watch the video.
(3:33 – 4:10)
How much time does it take to get over major life traumas and return to (a former state of) happiness according to a recent study ?GoedFout -
Vraag 9 of 15
9. Vraag
5 punt(en)First, read the question, then watch the video.
(4:10 – 8:07)
Jim Wright, Moreese Bickham, Harry S. Langerman and Pete Best are used by Daniel Gilbert as examples of people whoGoedFout -
Vraag 10 of 15
10. Vraag
4 punt(en)First, read the question, then watch the video.
(4:10 – 8:07) (same fragment as last question)
Match the descriptions to the persons.Sorteer elementen
- was a very respectable American politician who lost everything.
- spent a very long time in prison for a crime he did not commit.
- missed out on becoming the richest man in America.
- did not become part of one of the most famous popgroups ever.
-
Jim Wright
-
Moreese Bickham
-
Harry S. Langerman
-
Pete Best
Goed / 4 PuntenFout / 4 Punten -
Vraag 11 of 15
11. Vraag
2 punt(en)First, read the question, then watch the video.
(8:07 – 9:22)
Match the two kinds of happiness to their correct descriptions.Sorteer elementen
- what we make when we don’t get what we wanted
- what we get when we get what we wanted
-
synthetic happiness is
-
natural happiness is
Goed / 2 PuntenFout / 2 Punten -
Vraag 12 of 15
12. Vraag
5 punt(en)First, read the question, then watch the video.
(9:22 – 13:47)
Dan Gilbert tells about the experiment with the Monet prints to show thatGoedFout -
Vraag 13 of 15
13. Vraag
5 punt(en)First, read the question, then watch the video.
(13:47 – 15:00)
What is the enemy of synthetic happiness?GoedFout -
Vraag 14 of 15
14. Vraag
5 punt(en)First, read the question, then watch the video.
(15:00 – 18:56)
The Harvard experiment makes clear that students (and by inference people in general)GoedFout -
Vraag 15 of 15
15. Vraag
1 punt(en)First, read the question, then watch the video.
(18:56 – end)
These are the last paragraphs of Dan Gilbert’s speech. Fill in the missing words or phrases:
(Note: The Bard = William Shakespeare)Sorteer elementen
- but thinking makes it so
- overrating the difference
- violate the rules
- remorse for the horror
- ambition is bounded
- we’re prudent
- capacity to manufacture
-
The Bard said everything best, of course, and he’s making my point here but he’s making it hyperbolically: ”‘Tis nothing good or bad / ……….1………..” It’s nice poetry, but that can’t exactly be right. Is there really nothing good or bad? Is it really the case that gall bladder surgery and a trip to Paris are just the same thing? That seems like a one-question IQ test. They can’t be exactly the same.
-
In more turgid prose, but closer to the truth, was the father of modern capitalism, Adam Smith, and he said this. This is worth contemplating: ”The great source of both the misery and disorders of human life seems to arise from ……….2……….. between one permanent situation and another …
-
Some of these situations may, no doubt, deserve to be preferred to others, but none of them can deserve to be pursued with that passionate ardor which drives us to ……….3……….. either of prudence or of justice, or to corrupt the future tranquility of our minds, either by shame from the remembrance of our own folly,
-
or by ………4……….. of our own injustice.” In other words: yes, some things are better than others.
We should have preferences that lead us into one future over another. But when those preferences drive us too hard and too fast because we have overrated the difference between these futures, we are at risk. -
When our ………5……….. , it leads us to work joyfully. When our ambition is unbounded, it leads us to lie, to cheat, to steal, to hurt others, to sacrifice things of real value.
-
When our fears are bounded, ………6……….., we’re cautious, we’re thoughtful. When our fears are unbounded and overblown, we’re reckless, and we’re cowardly.
-
The lesson I want to leave you with from these data is that our longings and our worries are both to some degree overblown, because we have within us the ………7……….. the very commodity we are constantly chasing when we choose experience.
Thank you.
GoedFout
Wie is Dan Gilbert
Dan Gilbert gelooft dat de meesten van ons bij onze levenslange zoektocht naar geluk gebruik maken van de verkeerde schatkaart. Onze hersenen schatten systematisch verkeerd in wat ons gelukkig maakt. Net zoals optische illusies ons iets doen zien wat er niet is of in feite iets anders is. Iedereen wordt volgens hem op dezelfde manier voor de gek wordt gehouden. Deze grilligheden in onze cognitie maken dat mensen maar slechte voorspellers zijn van hun eigen geluk. Meer informatie over Dan Gilbert (bron: www.ted.com/speakers)
Wat is TED
TED is een organisatie zonder winstoogmerk die zich erop toelegt ideeën te verspreiden, meestal in de vorm van korte, krachtige toespraken (18 minuten of minder). TED begon in 1984 als een conferentie waar de thema’s Technology, Entertainment en Design samenkwamen. Vandaag de dag komen echter bijna alle onderwerpen aan bod — van wetenschap tot business en mondiale problemen — in meer dan 100 talen.
(bron: TED: our organization)
